Why I like Tom Cruise
May 14th, 2006 by Bill
It boils down to this: he’s been in a lot of movies that I love. I pay as little attention as possible to his public appearance hoo-hah, his marriage to Katie whoever, the baby, Scientology … blah blah blah. Though, obviously (since I’ve mentioned them) I can’t escape that crap.
But for the most part I don’t pay attention. I roll my eyes and change the channel or whatever.
Everything about the Tom Cruise public image makes him someone that makes me want to tear my hair out. And I wish to heaven he’d stop making the work-out movies like those endless Mission Impossible films. (As an aside, when any film is associated with the term “franchise” I head for the hills. It means it’s a hamburger.)
But … Cruise has been in great movies and, part of why they have been great is – hang on to your drawers – Tom Cruise. That’s the puzzler about him. He’s remarkably good. So why is he connected with all the other nonsense?
Well, people are odd. All of them. Including, and perhaps moreso than others, Tom Cruise.
But look at what he’s been involved with (when not flying planes or jumping on Oprah’s couch):
- Collateral
- The Last Samurai
- Minority Report
- Jerry Maguire
- A Few Good Men
- Rain Man
Those films make it difficult for me to dismiss Mr. Cruise. In fact, I prefer to dismiss the other nonsense and see him in terms of those films. He’s really very good at what he does. Perhaps too much so – maybe when you are that good it gets too easy to be self-indulgent and follow whatever random notion captures your imagination.
Whatever the true view of Tom Cruise is there’s no denying he’s good at what he does when he commits to it. So my hope is the current nonsense passes soon and, as I suspect is the case, he gets back quickly to simply bringing great performances to films of good stories.
Tom Cruise, the actor (as opposed to the celebrity) is extraordinarily good at his job. The celebrity is simply annoying. The actor, on the other hand, is about as good as it gets.
Bill, I would agree that the projects he’s been involved in are very good. He’s got a discerning eye for a good story and good directors. However, he’s not, in my opinion, a very good actor. He always plays the same character, and I have only ever forgotten it was TOM CRUISE playing the part twice (Born On The Fourth of July, and Minority Report). He doesn’t lose himself in the parts, is what I’m saying.
Well, that’s true. There’s a sameness to his performances. (I’m not sure if I ever actually saw Born on the Fourth of July.) But as you say … he has a discerning eye. Last night I watched Collateral again although Cruise was hyped as “the star” it’s really about the character of Jamie Fox.
I think brilliance comes from craziness. People don’t realize that celebrities were once the freaks in drama class. Ya know, the ones you made fun of and didn’t talk to? Yeah, they’re just all grown up now with more money than God. Of course they’re gonna go a little nuts.
Yes, crazy indeed. Unfortunately, that’s the aspect the media loves to indulge. So we’re bombarded with celebrity lunacy.
that’s a good point bill. one that isn’t made too often. i feel similarly about woody allen. love his work, not 100% on board with the whole marry-your-adopted-daughter thing.
thanks for the perspective check.
he’s been in some stinkers, too - I wasn’t into Top Gun, Cocktail, Days of Thunder, All the Right Moves…
He seemed like he was doing these roles underwater.